Today: February 21, 2018, 6:25 pm
Legal & Law

LAG Berlin-Brandenburg: Works council members’ claim for transfer to permanent employment contract fails

Two members of a mail order company’s works council failed with their claim before the Landesarbeitsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg (Regional Labour Court of Berlin-Brandenburg) to be transferred to a permanent employment contract (Az.: 23 Sa 1445/15; 23 Sa 1446/15).
GRP Rainer LLP
GRP Rainer LLP 2016-03-02 08:24:40
GRP Rainer Lawyers and Tax Advisors in Cologne, Berlin, Bonn, Düsseldorf, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Munich, Stuttgart and London conclude: The Christmas shopping season gives rise to an increased demand for labour at mail order companies. Accordingly, more workers are taken on during this time on a temporary basis. Come the end of the year, it may be the case that a portion of these workers are kept on as the circumstances require and depending on their work performance– some with fixed-term employment contracts, others with permanent employment contracts.

Two members of the works council failed with their claims to be moved onto a permanent employment contract. They argued that the only reason they had not been transferred to a permanent employment contract was because of their service on the works council. Like the Arbeitsgericht Potsdam (Labour Court of Potsdam) before it, the LAG Berlin-Brandenburg dismissed the claims in its ruling of January 13, 2016. It stated that the right to be transferred to a permanent employment contract could not be rejected on the basis that the worker in question had served on the works council, this kind of discrimination being forbidden under employment law. However, it went on to say that the plaintiffs could not portray themselves as having being been discriminated against in this way, especially as the mail order company would still have a works council and the selection of workers to be retained took place according to a formal process. This also took members of the works council into account. The LAG held that mere speculation that they had not been moved onto a permanent employment contract because of their service on the works council was not enough.

Nonetheless, employers need to be careful when it comes to applying fixed-terms to employment contracts. In the absence of an objective reason, this type of fixed-term can only last for a maximum of two years. Within this timeframe, the employment contract cannot be extended more than three times. If these deadlines have expired and there is no objective reason to apply a new fixed-term, the employee may be entitled to be moved onto a permanent employment contract.

An employment contract regulates the key aspects of an employment relationship and should therefore be prepared thoroughly and in detail. This particularly applies to fixed-term employment contracts. Lawyers who are competent in the field of employment law can be consulted to protect your interests.
Press Information
GRP Rainer LLP
Hohenzollernring 21-23

50672 Cologne


Herr Michael Rainer
Lawyer, Managing Partner

Published by
Michael Rainer

# 442 Words
Related Articles
More From Legal & Law
Bell & Co. For Disputes & Civil [..]
Bell & Co is a boutique dispute resolution firm, with significant expertise in employment law, family law and civil disputes, [..]
Pets & Divorce: Watts McCray Seeks the [..]
Australian laws say during a separation or divorce the court should treat the family dog like any other chattel. In [..]
Woodbridge Wealth Securities Investigation
On December 11, Woodbridge Group of Companies filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, citing costs of expansion, litigation and a [..]
Changes Made to Australia’s Law on Childhood [..]
This month five members of the Full Court of the Family Court have ruled that children experiencing gender dysphoria and [..]
Watts McCray Can Provide Advice in Child [..]
When parents disagree where a child is to live or move to when they are going through a separation it [..]

Disclaimer: If you have any questions regarding information in this press release please contact the company added in the press release. Please do not contact pr-inside. We will not be able to assist you. PR-inside disclaims the content included in this release.