Today: December 15, 2017, 10:42 pm
Legal & Law

Kartellamt prohibits best-price clause on hotel reservation portals

The Bundeskartellamt (German Federal Cartel Office) has prohibited a hotel reservation portal from using so-called “narrow” best-price clauses, arguing that they restrict competition.
GRP Rainer LLP
GRP Rainer LLP 2016-02-22 10:32:52
GRP Rainer Lawyers and Tax Advisors in Cologne, Berlin, Bonn, Düsseldorf, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Munich, Stuttgart and London conclude: The use of best-price clauses has long been controversial and a thorn in the side of competition watchdogs. These provisions can constitute an infringement of competition law because they are capable of hampering free competition and ultimately harm consumers.

The dispute between the Bundeskartellamt and the hotel reservation portal has also been going on for some time. The portal initially compelled hotels to indicate the lowest room price, the maximum number of rooms available and the most favourable booking and cancellation conditions. This obligation applied to all booking channels (broad best-price clause). The portal eventually permitted the hotels to release more attractive offers on other portals, yet any prices featured on their own websites were still not allowed to be lower than those on the portal (narrow best-price clause).

However, the Kartellamt took the view that even this narrow best-price clause still constituted a restriction of competition, stating that it hampered competition both between the rival portals as well as between the hotels. It went on to say that this ultimately also harms consumers, as hardly any incentive remains for hotels to offer their rooms via other new platforms at a lower price so long as the hotels were not allowed to change their prices on their own websites. Moreover, it claimed that this would also make it more difficult for new providers to enter this market. The competition regulators have therefore demanded that the clauses in question be removed from the agreements and general terms and conditions by the end of January 2016. The portal can appeal this order and apply for interim legal protection against its immediate enforcement.

The Kartellamt has already forbidden these kinds of best-price clauses on other portals.

Infringements of competition law may be met with severe punishments, including formal warnings, claims for damages and injunction suits.

Businesses can turn to lawyers who are competent in the fields of competition law and intellectual property law to enforce or fend off these types of claims. ..
Press Information
GRP Rainer LLP
Hohenzollernring 21-23

50672 Cologne


Herr Michael Rainer
Lawyer, Managing Partner

Published by
Michael Rainer

# 379 Words
Related Articles
More From Legal & Law
Watts McCray Can Provide Advice in Child [..]
When parents disagree where a child is to live or move to when they are going through a separation it [..]
Watts McCray Can Provide Advice in Child [..]
Watts McCray, Australia’s leading family lawyers, can assist clients with difficult parenting cases that involve relocation to [..]
Late Filing of Annual Company Returns in [..]
In early November 2017, in District Court Number 8 in the Four Courts, Dublin, Judge Brennan presided over more than [..]
What Happens if Bill for Marriage Equality [..]
Australians are almost at the end of same-sex marriage plebiscite voting period. The results of the postal survey will be [..]
What Happens if Bill for Marriage Equality [..]
Australians are almost at the end of same-sex marriage plebiscite voting period. The results of the postal survey will be [..]

Disclaimer: If you have any questions regarding information in this press release please contact the company added in the press release. Please do not contact pr-inside. We will not be able to assist you. PR-inside disclaims the content included in this release.